home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_780a / 780ar040.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  84KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | tree
OCR: Petitioners to amended their complaint repeatedly predi- cate never acts sought add arson ot bom bing respondents as com- The reason clear: mitted 10 such acts under "Bombing' 11 any event not 1961(1) predicate act RICO See U.s Petitioncrs therefore cannot salvage their RICO claim by this device. Petitioners' Have Not Alleged Habbs Coaduet Act. which Con- stitutes Extortion Iapun the Petitioners rely exclusively upon allegations of extor 1951. tion under the federal Hobba Act. 18 U.S. See Cplt. 97-98 05 RICO Hobbs Case Act Statement extortion 5(a) {f){1} as RICO See does indeed qualify predicate act under allege. 18 U.S. 1961(1) The conduct however does 1ou make out even singte instance minimum extort ion under the Hobbs Act. much less the RICO requirement of twa such acts. The Hobbs comme ...